GOURMET Knowledge Gap Analysis & Filling Strategy
Date: 2026-06-09
Current State
Main Knowledge Graph (gourmet_kg.db โ kanban board)
- 9,665 entities โ (rich data)
- 783 observations โ
- 11 domains โ
- 6 symbols โ
- 2 bridges โ
- 14,504 edges โ
- But: 0 embedding vectors โ
Gematria KG (gematria_kg.db โ vault)
- 1 entity, 0 relationships, 0 embeddings โ (essentially empty)
- This is the database referenced by research converges analysis
Operational DB (gourmet.db โ root)
- 137 domain observations โ
- 68 causal signals โ
- 6 domains (Political, Military, Religious, Economic, Bocurrency, DeepDive) โ
- But: 0 entity embeddings โ
The Gap
The main KG has 9,665 entities with rich properties (gematria values, digital roots, domains, multiple gematria systems) but no embedding vectors. The convergence analysis (crystallization #4: KG embeddings mirror theoretical predictions) cannot be verified without embeddings.
Filling Strategy (v30.2)
Phase 1: Embedding Generation
- Extract all 9,665 entities with their properties from
gourmet_kg.db - For each entity, create a text representation combining:
- Entity label/names
- Domain assignments
- Gematria values (simple, english, jewish, pythagorean)
- Relationship context (top 5 edges)
- Generate embedding vectors using a sentence transformer (e.g.,
all-MiniLM-L6-v2viasentence-transformers) - Store embeddings in
gematria_kg.db
Phase 2: Migration
- Copy all entities from
gourmet_kg.dbโgematria_kg.db - Preserve all properties as JSON
- Add embedding vectors
- Create proper indexes for similarity search
Phase 3: Convergence Analysis
- Compute pairwise cosine similarity between cross-domain entity pairs
- Identify clusters that span multiple domains
- Compare clusters against theoretical predictions (crystallization #4)
- Document results in vault report
Priority
This is Stream 2 of v30 (t_87dbfde0). Depends on v30.1 (oracle grounding) only for real signal data to validate embeddings against. Can run in parallel.